<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Red-Washing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redwashing.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redwashing.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Uncovering true, transparent corporate philanthropy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:41:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on (REDWASHING):  Will thousands of red iPods, T-shirts and cellphones really make the world a better place? by Chris MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://redwashing.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/red-washing-will-thousands-of-red-ipods-t-shirts-and-cellphones-really-make-the-world-a-better-place/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redwashing.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/red-washing-will-thousands-of-red-ipods-t-shirts-and-cellphones-really-make-the-world-a-better-place/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably a good habit to question corporate motives, and it&#039;s an even better habit to ask of any charity what percentage of its revenues go to helping the people they&#039;re supposedly committed to helping. My two main comments about (Red):
1) No one&#039;s claiming it&#039;s a charity. It&#039;s a *business* model that harnesses the power of consumerism to help people who need help.
2) It would be a shame to let the &quot;icky&quot; feeling that some of us get from the idea of making charity &quot;sexy&quot; get in the way of saving lives. If it works, it works. 
I&#039;ve blogged about (Red) a few times on my own blog, most recently about a year ago, here:
http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2006/10/ethics-of-product-red.html
The &quot;$100 Laptop&quot; project has similarly recently moved to harness the power of consumerism to do some good in the world. See here:
http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2007/09/harnessing-consumerism-to-get-laptops.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably a good habit to question corporate motives, and it&#8217;s an even better habit to ask of any charity what percentage of its revenues go to helping the people they&#8217;re supposedly committed to helping. My two main comments about (Red):<br />
1) No one&#8217;s claiming it&#8217;s a charity. It&#8217;s a *business* model that harnesses the power of consumerism to help people who need help.<br />
2) It would be a shame to let the &#8220;icky&#8221; feeling that some of us get from the idea of making charity &#8220;sexy&#8221; get in the way of saving lives. If it works, it works.<br />
I&#8217;ve blogged about (Red) a few times on my own blog, most recently about a year ago, here:<br />
<a href="http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2006/10/ethics-of-product-red.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2006/10/ethics-of-product-red.html</a><br />
The &#8220;$100 Laptop&#8221; project has similarly recently moved to harness the power of consumerism to do some good in the world. See here:<br />
<a href="http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2007/09/harnessing-consumerism-to-get-laptops.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessethics.ca/blog/2007/09/harnessing-consumerism-to-get-laptops.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
